http://matociquala.livejournal.com/1308186.html
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
War Arrow |
Meme War |
Lead | ||
|
Check it out and spread the word:
http://matociquala.livejournal.com/1308186.html |
||||
|
|
||||
felice |
#1 | |||
|
Go Anonymous! 8) As a small contribution towards the War, I've added a link to the bottom of forum pages...
|
||||
|
|
||||
doloras |
#2 | |||
|
Anonymous *is* the Remote, 500 years early. No leaders, no morality, just a shared culture (mainly composed of lulz, joke-racism, cat macros and Pedobear). I'm extremely impressed that this time their attention has been caught by a just cause.
The Stacks - the site for
Faction Paradox fanfic and other fanworks
"Larry was with us in spirit" - Kate Orman
(for more of my messed up thoughts on culture, magick and revolutionary politics) |
||||
|
|
||||
War Arrow |
#3 | |||
felice wrote: Nice work. Curiously enough, I was about to add a link to a YouTube video of an old edition of World In Action (50s/60s BBC documentary) which contains the last publically broadcast interview with LRH - although it doesn't portray him in a particularly good light, being the 50s and the BBC it's pretty damn innocuous. Despite which, I get:
This video has been removed due to terms of use violation.
Very curious. Let's all be careful out there eh? http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/460/1201116421097ig4.jpg
Not quite sure about the fags bit but anyway... Hope the admin won't mind me providing this link, but there's a fair old buzz about this over at the
Dicky Dawkins board: http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=34724&start=0
Last Edited By: War Arrow 28 January, 2008 4:27 PM.
Edited 2 times.
|
||||
|
|
||||
doloras |
#4 | |||
|
Anonymous speaks in the deliberately offensive dialect of 4Chan, where everyone is some kind of "fag" or another. I would say "especially the
girls", but a rule of 4Chan is that there are no girls on the internet. Here's a "defagged" version of that poster.
Those who care about Wikipedia might want to go and prevent the article on Project Chanology being deleted. The Stacks - the site for
Faction Paradox fanfic and other fanworks
"Larry was with us in spirit" - Kate Orman
(for more of my messed up thoughts on culture, magick and revolutionary politics)
Last Edited By: doloras 28 January, 2008 7:09 PM.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
doloras |
#5 | |||
|
The Stacks - the site for
Faction Paradox fanfic and other fanworks
"Larry was with us in spirit" - Kate Orman
(for more of my messed up thoughts on culture, magick and revolutionary politics) |
||||
|
|
||||
Curufea |
#6 | |||
|
BTW - Is it just me, or does the synthetic voice on Warren Ellis' blog (the second video in the original blog link) sounds disturbingly like the Apperture
Science computer from Portal? Which isn't really a synthetic voice - but a human pretending to be synthetic, and then modulated/filtered.
|
||||
|
|
||||
doloras |
#7 | |||
|
I'm reliably informed by Anonymous sources that it's the voice of Microsoft Sam.
The Stacks - the site for
Faction Paradox fanfic and other fanworks
"Larry was with us in spirit" - Kate Orman
(for more of my messed up thoughts on culture, magick and revolutionary politics) |
||||
|
|
||||
War Arrow |
#8 | |||
doloras wrote: Here's where I reveal myself as an internet dummy. Said page is listed as semi-protected. Er... is that good?
|
||||
|
|
||||
doloras |
#9 | |||
|
Hey, it's alright to mention Scientology, as long as you attached the appropriate Googlebombing link.
Good to hear that the Dawkins crowd are getting into it - that's not the impression I got from the various blogs, where all the hard-core atheists were saying that Scientology was no different from Christianity or Islam and we should destroy those first because they're the real threat. I must admit I have little sympathy with Dawkins' social ideas. I refer to the way that the idea of "God" is held to be the source of all evil in the human world. I'm a materialist, who sees religion as "the heart of a heartless world, the soul of soulless conditions, the painkiller of the masses". Believing that "religion" is some kind of malignant non-material virus which causes problems in and of itself seems as superstitious to me that believing that "the Devil" is a malignant non-material person who's always tempting and corrupting things. Religion, like any idea, is not a real thing but a way of explaining real things. Importantly, it can inspire both positive and negative behaviour. Religion inspired the Inquisition and the Taliban regime, but also inspired Martin Luther King, Malcolm X and Johnny Cash. The Stacks - the site for
Faction Paradox fanfic and other fanworks
"Larry was with us in spirit" - Kate Orman
(for more of my messed up thoughts on culture, magick and revolutionary politics) |
||||
|
|
||||
War Arrow |
#10 | |||
|
Hmmm. Know where you're coming from, particularly about the fundamentalist atheist tendency - extremes create extremes and those wanting ANONYMOUS to go
after one of the "big three" are, I would suggest, only interested in rationalism as a stick with which they can beat people over the head.
I think there's a subtle distinction to be made here between what Dawkins has said and what has been generally understood, and I don't think he has actually said that religion is the root of all evil, rather that 'evil' (however you may wish to define it, which is another subject entirely) tends to flourish where thought is based on half-truth or supposition as opposed to objective evidence. The title of his recent ish TV show The Root of all Evil was apparently not his choice and not one he was particularly happy with. Furthermore he has made very similar points to your own observation giving Martin Luther King and Johnny Cash as examples. "Believing that "religion" is some kind of malignant non-material virus which causes problems in and of itself seems... superstitious..." Not at all (although the malignance or benevolence probably is debatable), self-replicating ideas (memes) behave in an entirely viral manner. Apocalyptic cults (as an extreme example) tend to feed on insecurities so their beliefs are easily spread without any need for justification - that there really is a coming apocalypse, that the blind boy child can see again etc. Personally, I'm uneasy with any one-size-fits-all philosophy, and I don't regard all forms of religion as being part of one great big nasty blob, but there's big grey areas here, and I'm distrustful of any belief sytem (whether religious or political) which facilitates censorship or other forms of oppression. I believe in the great majority of cases, religion can provide a convenient excuse without necessarily being the root cause, but I'm still glad we have Dawkins because I don't think hellfire preachers who believe homosexuals, non-believers, and people who teach the theory of evolution are "inherently evil" (for example) are just going to go away with a few hundred signatures on a petition. "Religion, like any idea, is not a real thing but a way of explaining real things..." We both know this, but there's plenty who apparently think otherwise and are quite happy to express certain more extreme beliefs with unfortunate consequences. |
||||
|
|
||||